For instance, in the deontological theory, there are
two debates among moral philosophers: Moral Generalism and Particularism.
In the light of wilttegensteinian philosophy, they hold, it is possible to
have another way of understanding named as "Moderate Moral Generalism".
Another example can be presented in "Moral Realism" which holds that
moral properties such as good, bad, wrong, right, etc. are real. Contrary to
moral realists, are those who believe that such properties are non-real.
However, "super-realists" are the third group holds that, according to the
well-formed grammar of the "real", both debates are in the wrong picture.
The aim of this paper is to argue these two debates in the way that Iranian
philosophers have presented in the light of philosophy of Wittgenstein
