У статті розглядаються проблеми володіння та користування чужим майном як на підставі певного правового титулу, так і без нього. Визначено концептуальні проблеми правового регулювання нетитульного володіння чужою річчю. Запропоновано запровадити більш узгоджений юридичний механізм щодо забезпечення балансу інтересів власника та добросовісного набувача
В статье рассматриваются проблемы владения и пользования чужим имуществом как на основании определенного правового титула, так и без него. Определены концептуальные проблемы правового регулирования нетитульных владений чужой вещью. Предложено ввести более согласованный юридический механизм по обеспечению баланса интересов собственника и добросовестного приобретателя.
This article discusses the ownership and use of another's property as defined on the basis of title, and without it. The author defines conceptual problems of legal regulation of ownership of non-titular alien thing. Also the author proposes to ensure balance between the interests of the owner and a bona fide purchaser for a more coherent legal mechanism. English abstractP. Guyvan Temporal characteristics of the relations connected with the use of another's property This article discusses the ownership and use of another's property as defined on the basis of title, and without it. The author defines conceptual problems of legal regulation of ownership of non-titular alien thing. Also the author proposes to ensure balance between the interests of the owner and a bona fide purchaser for a more coherent legal mechanism. In the modern civil legislation of Ukraine there is a system of protection of subjects' rights in possession of another's property. This protection is inherent not only the title holder (users), but also to those who do not have the appropriate legal basis at the time. By these mechanisms include chapter 31 of the Civil Code, which directly qualifies as possession of another's property right (without limiting it only title ownership), Institute of acquiring title to a bona fide entity disposing of invalid (art. 330 Civil Code), the mechanism of protection against debt collection (art. 388 Civil Code), acquisitive prescription (art.. 344 Civil Code). However, an adequate balance between these institutions has not yet been achieved, largely due to a certain duplication and ambiguity of statutory language.
