Показать сокращенную информацию
dc.contributor.author | Ревенок, Наталія | |
dc.contributor.author | Revenok, Natalia | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-02-24T09:16:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-02-24T09:16:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Ревенок Н. Мистецтвознавча експертиза українського фарфору та фаянсу ХІХ – початку ХХ ст. та методи її проведення / Наталія Ревенок // Українська академія мистецтва : дослідн. та наук.-метод. пр. Київ, 2015. Вип. 24. С. 149-157. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://195.20.96.242:5068/kvnaoma-xmlui/handle/123456789/191 | |
dc.description.abstract | У статті йдеться про методи дослідження художньої порцеляни у мистецтвознавчій експертизі. Важливою частиною методології експертних досліджень тонкокерамічних виробів ХІХ – початку ХХ ст. є розробка класифікації виробів для проведення порівняльного аналізу типових предметів. Висвітлені основні критерії сучасної атрибуції, експертизи та ідентифікації українського фарфору та фаянсу в наукових розвідках. The article deals with the research methods of art expertise in porcelain. An important part of the methodology of expert study products of fine ceramics of the XIX – early XX century is the development of a classification of products for a comparative analysis of similar items. The article deals the basic criteria of modern attribution, expertise and identification of Ukrainian porcelain and faience in research. Methodology of art-examination based on a comprehensive study object of faience and porcelain provides for art history, history, culturological researches, attribution, and technical and technological analysis. Exploring the ceramic objects, we proceed from the main conceptual provisions of the theory of culture that involve identifying ideas, areas of research sites, professional knowledge of the basic fundamentals of art history and the formulation of the leading areas of expertise products of fine ceramics. The increased interest in of cultural property including to the art of porcelain and faience, has led to the emergence of the national school of art-examination, which nowadays continues to improve. The problems are the lack of research a constant methodology of artexpertise of fine ceramics products and the necessity deeper study of ways to improve their research methods, order of scientific description ceramic art things, and the need for their implementation. Primary methodological techniques well known in the scientific study of art characterization are based on reasonable definitions of their concepts and apply for proof of authorship investigated artwork, time of manufacture, installation degree of preservation of monuments, the presence of restoration interventions, and determine its supplies of certain cultural, historical, artistic or scientific value. The outcomes of the examination are conclusions of expert on the results of studies indicating the main aspects of the confirmation or refutation of the authenticity of a work of art. Expertise and attribution of art, especially the art of porcelain evaluation today is very relevant, especially for the development of the antique market. In the sale of products is made of highly evaluating them, or set the starting price at auction. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | other | en_US |
dc.subject | мистецтвознавча експертиза | en_US |
dc.subject | фарфор | en_US |
dc.subject | фаянс | en_US |
dc.subject | art expertise | en_US |
dc.subject | porcelain | en_US |
dc.subject | faience | en_US |
dc.title | Мистецтвознавча експертиза українського фарфору та фаянсу ХІХ – початку ХХ ст. та методи її проведення | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Art expertise of Ukrainian porcelain and faience XIX – early XX century and methods for its carrying out | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |